{"id":327,"date":"2020-03-24T13:55:06","date_gmt":"2020-03-24T13:55:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/stor-i-student-sites\/libby-daniells\/?p=327"},"modified":"2023-09-20T16:24:53","modified_gmt":"2023-09-20T16:24:53","slug":"directed-acyclic-graphs-dags","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lancaster.ac.uk\/stor-i-student-sites\/libby-daniells\/2020\/03\/24\/directed-acyclic-graphs-dags\/","title":{"rendered":"Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

In my last two blog posts I focused on how to analyse the results of clinical trials through both Meta Analysis <\/a>and Simultaneous Inference<\/a>. Here we’re going to take a step back and look at how we choose a suitable model with relevant variables considered. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) are used as a visual representation of associations between variables or factors in models. I first came across them in an Epidemiological context during the MATH464 course on Principles of Epidemiology given by Tom Palmer<\/a> here at ÌÇÐÄVlog and thought I’d share the basic concepts with you all. Although I’ll discuss them in an epidemiology setting, DAGs can be used in a variety of applications to demonstrate associations and causal effects. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

We’ll start with a simple definition of what DAGs are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n